送信日時 : 2001年 9月 25日 火曜日 7:22 PM
件名 :NEWS EMBARGO AFTER ISRAELI LINK LEAK（イスラエル関与漏洩以後の情報封鎖）
NEWS EMBARGO AFTER ISRAELI LINK LEAK
A US military intelligence source revealed details of an internal intelligence memo that points to the Israeli Mossad intelligence service having links to the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks.
The intelligence source, who requested his name be withheld, confirmed the internal US intelligence memo circulated four weeks ago described information that pointed to the threat of a covert Israeli operation on US soil to turn mass public opinion against Palestinian Arabs via an apparent terrorist attack on US interests that would give Israel the green light to implement a large scale military onslaught against the Palestinian Arab population.
The 11th September attack has been described by experts as being too sophisticated for a lone terrorist group to execute.
"This attack required a high level of military precision and the resources of an advanced intelligence agency. In addition, the attackers would have needed to be extremely familiar with both air force one flight operations, civil airline flight paths and aerial assault tactics on sensitive US cities like Washington, Stated David Stern an expert on Israeli intelligence operations.
The attacks targeted the Pentagon, World Trade Center towers, with the white house and air force also being targets according to the FBI.
"The attacks have certainly turned US public opinion firmly back in Israel's favor after 11 months of Palestinian uprising, heavy criticism of Israel over war crimes allegations and racism by a UN conference in Durban.
The attacks serve no Arab group or nation's interests but their timing came in the midst of international condemnation of Israel for its policy of death squad assassination of Palestinian political and police figures", added Stern. If verified, the news of Israel's involvement in the US attack will come as no surprise to intelligence experts.
The state of Israel has a long history of covert operations against Western targets with attacks on the King David Hotel, USS Liberty, murder of a Scandinavian UN envoy as well as espionage against the US during the Jonathan Pollard case.
On Wednesday the US defense department issued a warning to its officials to halt the leak of information on the investigation which it says is happening on a daily basis since the attacks occurred.
Subject: Was it a Israeli Conspiracy????-1
4000 Israeli Employees in WTC Absent the Day of the Attack
With the announcement of the attacks at the World Trade Center in New York, the international media, particularly the Israeli one, hurried to take advantage of the incident and started mourning 4000 Israelis who work at the two towers.
Then suddenly, no one ever mentioned anything about those Israelis and later it became clear that they remarkably did not show up in their jobs the day the incident took place. No one talked about any Israeli being killed or wounded in the attacks.
Arab diplomatic sources revealed to the Jordanian al-Watan newspaper that those Israelis remained absent that day based on hints from the Israeli General Security Apparatus, the Shabak, the fact which evoked unannounced suspicions on American officials who wanted to know how the Israeli government learned about the incident before it occurred, and the reasons why it refrained from informing the U.S authorities of the information it had.
Suspicions had increased further after Israeli newspaper Yadiot Ahranot revealed that the Shabak prevented Israeli premier Ariel Sharon from traveling to New York and particularly to the city eastern coast to participate in a festival organized by the Zionist organizations in support of the "Israel". Aharon Bernie, the commentator at the newspaper, brought up the issue and came up with a negative conclusion, saying no answer.
He then asked about the clue behind the Shabaks position in preventing Sharons participation, and again without giving an answer. Bernie added that Sharon, who was delighted for having his speech on top of the festival agenda, asked the head of the organization to mediate and convince the Shabak to change its position, but his attempts were in vein.
The next day after Sharons secretary officially announced that Sharon would not participate the incident took place.
For its part, the Israeli Haaretz newspaper revealed that the FBI arrested five Israelis four hours after the attack on the Twin Towers while filming the smoking skyline from the roof of their company building.
The FBI had arrested the five for puzzling behavior. They are said to have been caught videotaping the disaster in what was interpreted as cries of joy and mockery.
ISRAEL ATTACKED AMERICA!!!
As shocking as it may sound, the above stated statement is true!
CNN and other Media networks bombard us with facts that are carefully sandwiched between conclusions.
Since an average viewer does not have the ability to constantly separate facts from conclusions, there comes a time when he begins to consume the entire discourse as a fact. This is something Noam Chomsky called "manufacturing consent.
" To pin-point who is behind the bombing, one must separate the facts in the news, from the conclusions that are being drawn by analysts.
Tru asking yourself these questions ... Who would like to bomb USA?
United States is one country that has a very long list enemies, so this question does not help us in pin pointing the attacker. Who has the capacity to do it?
Out of very this very long list of enemies, there are very few who are capable of planning an executing an action on such a large scale with thiskind of success.
The sheer scale of the attack rules out the possibility of this action being carried out "freelance militants" (like Bin Laden) and independent militant organizations (like Islamic Jihad and Hamas).
The world has seen the capacity in which these organizations and these individuals operate and it is nothing even close to what we are witnessing in New York and Washington. Usama bin Laden attacked USS Cole.
Sinking a destroyer requires planning and resources that were not within the capacity of this man. He was able to blast a hole through the ship but could not sink it.
It doesn't not make sense to conclude that one man, who could not sink a destroyer, will succeed in destroying two large buildings in the heart of New York, successfully hijack at least four aircrafts and bomb highest military office in United States, cause a nationwide breakdown and make United States President go into hiding.
Similar conclusion can be drawn of other "independent" militant organizations. It is true that some extremist militant organizations in Middle East would like to see this happen but we must keep in mind that these organization hate Israel more than they hate United States.
If they could do something of this level they would have done it to Israel first. Militant attacks against Israel have so far been a few suicide bombings, most of whom in which the death toll could never exceed 100.
These organizations, that failed to kill a hundred people (or even close to that figure) in Israel, would be able to deliver such a devastating blow to a super power, miles away, in another continent.
The only logical conclusion is that the action was carried out by a "nation state" that has a history of conducting very complicated, undercover operations. No one has claimed responsibility for it Politically motivated violence is different from general crime because in the former, the perpetrator publicly admits that he was responsible for the act.
It is in his interest to claim responsibility for his action because acts of violence are basically intended to send a warning or a message to the enemy. In the absence of this warning or the message, the cause of the attack itself is defeated. When an act of politically motivated violence is followed by silence and no one steps forward to claim responsibility then we should understand that something is wrong.
Things are not what they appear to be. This was the case in WTC bombing. All of United States traditional enemies, who have in past claimed responsibility for their attacks on their enemies have Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Talibaan Usama bin Laden, all of denied and condemned the attack. Furthermore we should notice that in the News so far, no evidence has been publicly revealed that would point out that the attacks were carried out by Usama bin Laden.
All we are told is that "experts" believe that Usama bin Laden is responsible. One should ask, that in the absence of any solid evidence, how can these "experts" come to such a conclusion. Who will benefit from it?
So far the only party that seems to be benefiting from the present scenario is Israel. It was the term "Islamic terrorism" that gave Israel legitimacy in her war against Palestinians.
In the last few years a series of incidents took place that diluted the "psychological impact" of the term. First, photographs of children getting killed in Middle East by Israeli troops gave this country a strong negative image.
Secondly, the recent withdrawal of Israel from the International Racism Conference further damaged its world wide image. In the light of these incidents, something was needed to revive the meaning of the term "Islamic Terrorism", the term that has given Israel the only legitimacy in their war.
HOW CAN EHUD BARAK APPEAR IN THE BBC OFFICE
JUST MINUTES AFTER THE FINAL BOMBING
WITH A PRE-PREPARED INTERVIEW???
The bombings took the world by surprise.
Military officials, Government figures, leaders of foreign states all appeared on television and were clearly in a state of shock.
Taliban could not arrange an English speaking person on such a short notice, to appear for their interview on CNN.
While the whole world was stunned former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak appeared from BBCs main office in London with e pre written/ pre prepared speech.
He pentt 30 minutes speaking about how dangerous some "Islamic" countries and terrorists are. At the end of the interview, the news reporter stated that Mr. Barak joined him an hour before it was broadcasted, meaning Barak was there even an hour earlier. In real time of events this means he was there within minutes of the blast, with a pre-written interview.
He knew beforehand that the bombings will take place. It was not difficult to see that Barak came with a pre written speech as he is quick to pint out all of Israels enemies which he calls "rogue states".
The answers to the interview were carefully prepared to use public sentiments created by the blast, against enemies of Israel.
These could not have been developed between the time bombing took place and Barak appeared on BBC. Barak's presence in UK could also not have been co-incidental at that crucial time.
SEE HOW THIS FITS INTO THE FLOW OF WORLD EVENTS
Palestinian and Israeli clashes were seen all over the world as mass oppression of an ethnic community by a militarized state. Israel's recent withdrawal from International Conference on Racism was a severe dent to its international image.
After this withdrawal and incidents of violence in the Middle East, a diversion was needed, that would not just divert public attention from Middle Eastern to another continent but also revive themeaning the term, "Islamic Terrorism".
Furthermore, it would pull a super power in a direct conflict against Israel's traditional enemies. Mossad, Israeli intelligence has very carefully executed this operation to discredit its enemies on a global level but in the process it made a very crucial mistake.
They did everything too perfectly! We wont get to hear this side of the story in the Western Media because media industry in the West is in the hands of Jews who have strong sympathies for the state of Israel.
May Allah give us the wisdom to see the truth and the courage to act on it when we see it!
"We live in a society where almost everything we see hear and read is monitored by those who control the media. Before we confront our problems effectively, we must understand that someone, or some group is manipulating our reality. We must free ourselves from their control and discover the truth."