JVN: ISC BINDにおける複数の脆弱性(2026年7月)
食品安全委員会(第1036回)の開催について【9月8日開催】
JVN: Apache Tomcatにおける複数の脆弱性(2026年7月14日)
第83回食品表示部会【9月3日開催】
第769回 入札監理小委員会(開催案内)
令和8年8月27日からの大雨に伴う災害に係る普通交付税(11月定例交付分)の繰上げ交付
情報通信行政・郵政行政審議会 郵政行政分科会(第105回)
情報通信審議会 情報通信技術分科会(第198回)配付資料・議事概要・議事録
デジタル空間における情報流通の諸課題への対処に関する検討会(第14回)配付資料
令和8年度地方財政審議会(8月21日)議事要旨
令和8年度地方財政審議会(8月21日)議事要旨
令和8年度地方財政審議会(8月28日)議事要旨
情報通信審議会 情報通信政策部会 放送政策委員会 主査ヒアリング(株式会社TBSテレビ )
情報通信審議会 情報通信技術分科会 ITU 部会 放送業務委員会(第62回)配布資料
情報通信審議会 情報通信政策部会 放送政策委員会 主査ヒアリング(株式会社テレビ朝日 )
Texas and Florida Step Back from ALPRs
Within the last few days, two important state actions have dealt a big blow to automated license plate reader (ALPR) networks. This is just the latest proof of the growing tide of public opposition to mass surveillance. After years of successful grassroots battles to pull these cameras from local streets, bipartisan momentum is sweeping the country.
On August 28, Texas Governor Greg Abbott banned state agencies from spending public funds on Flock cameras. The order dropped just as The Texas Tribune prepared to publish an investigation revealing that a state agency had quietly funneled at least $30 million into building a sprawling surveillance network.
Then on August 31, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) issued a memo, announced by Governor Ron DeSantis, ordering the removal of all ALPRs from the right-of-way on state highways within 30 days. The order revokes all previously approved permits to install ALPRs, and bars transportation officials from issuing future permits.
FDOT officials stated that “the recent exponential increase in deployments along our roadways, coupled with concerning reports of misuse, data privacy concerns, and surveillance schemes merit immediate action to preserve Floridians’ sovereignty and quality of life.” FDOT’s action has been followed by a surge of local governments in Florida canceling or pausing their vendor contracts.
Much more work remains. Many ALPRs in Florida are not on state highways, but sit on city streets, county roads, residential driveways, and shopping center parking lots—and FDOT's order doesn't touch any of them. Likewise, the Texas directive leaves local agencies free to use city, county, federal, and private funds to install cameras.
This week’s good news follows years of pushback from local advocates that has seen dozens of cities sever ties with surveillance companies. According to some metrics, during the last 30 days, an average of three localities per day has halted contracts with Flock. Other advocates have been resisting ALPRs in statehouses and court houses, and by blowing the whistle with investigative activism.
The moves in Florida and Texas also illustrate the power that the executive branch can wield to curtail mass surveillance with almost immediate results. We hope that the California Governor Gavin Newsom and the California Department of Transportation will take notice and initiate steps to curb this technology, starting with removing the ALPRs that U.S. Border Patrol and the Drug Enforcement Administration have installed on California highways.
EFF’s position remains: ALPR mass surveillance – the indiscriminate, continuous collection and retention of location data on every driver, regardless of suspicion – should not exist. This past week’s actions in Texas and Florida are good steps forward, but we are still far from the finish line. We will continue working alongside community groups to keep cameras off local streets, while urging judges and state lawmakers to impose enforceable restraints on this warrantless mass surveillance.