情報通信審議会 情報通信技術分科会(第191回)の開催について
第3回 日マレーシアICT共同作業部会の結果
地域DXに向けた計画の策定等の伴走支援を受ける地方公共団体等の 三次公募の選定結果
小売物価統計調査規則の一部を改正する省令案に関する意見募集の結果
情報報通信審議会 電気通信事業政策部会 接続政策委員会(第75回)の開催について
IPネットワーク設備委員会 モバイル網固定電話作業班(第2回)・電気通信番号政策委員会(第46回)合同会合 開催案内
国際海底ケーブルの防護等に関する検討会(第1回)の開催について
電気通信事業法施行規則等の一部改正に関する意見募集の結果 (新リース会計基準等の公表等を踏まえた規定の整備・接続に関する事項)
自動運転時代の“次世代のITS通信”研究会(第3期第4回)
「国際海底ケーブルの防護等に関する検討会」の開催
ファイル共有ソフトの不適切な利用による著作権侵害に関する注意喚起
政策評価審議会 政策評価制度部会(第43回)(令和7年11月7日開催)資料
情報通信法学研究メディア法分科会(令和7年度第1回会合)
家計調査報告(家計収支編)2025年(令和7年)9月分及び7〜9月期平均
一般職技術系(情報通信行政)の情報を更新しました
Reflections on the impact of digital infrastructure and racism in traditional communities
EFF Teams Up With AV Comparatives to Test Android Stalkerware Detection by Major Antivirus Apps
EFF has, for many years, raised the alarm about the proliferation of stalkerware—commercially-available apps designed to be installed covertly on another person’s device and exfiltrate data from that device without their knowledge. In particular, we have urged the makers of anti-virus products for Android phones to improve their detection of stalkerware and call it out explicitly to users when it is found. In 2020 and 2021, AV Comparatives ran tests to see how well the most popular anti-virus products detected stalkerware from many different vendors. The results were mixed, with some high-scoring companies and others that had alarmingly low detection rates. Since malware detection is an endless game of cat and mouse between anti-virus companies and malware developers, we felt that the time was right to take a more up-to-date snapshot of how well the anti-virus companies are performing. We’ve teamed up with the researchers at AV Comparatives to test the most popular anti-virus products for Android to see how well they detect the most popular stalkerware products in 2025.
Here is what we found:
Stalkerware detection is still a mixed bag. Notably, Malwarebytes detected 100% of the stalkerware products we tested for. ESET, Bitdefender, McAfee, and Kaspersky detected all but one sample. This is a marked improvement over the 2021 test, which also found only one app with a 100% detection rate (G Data), but the next-best performing products had detect rates of 80-85%. Google Play Protect and Trend Micro had the lowest detection rates in the 2025 test, at 53% and 59% respectively. The poor performance of Google Play Protect is unsurprising: because it is the anti-virus solution on so many Android phones by default, some stalkerware includes specific instructions to disable detection by Google Play Protect as part of the installation process.
There are fewer stalkerware products out there. In 2020 and 2021, AV Comparatives tested 20 unique stalkerware products from different vendors. In 2025, we tested 17. We found that many stalkerware apps are essentially variations on the same underlying product and that the number of unique underlying products appears to have decreased in recent years. We cannot be certain about the cause of this decline, but we speculate that increased attention from regulators may be a factor. The popularity of small, cheap, Bluetooth-enabled physical trackers such as Apple AirTags and Tiles as an alternative method of location-tracking may also be undercutting the stalkerware market.
We hope that these tests will help survivors of domestic abuse and others who are concerned about stalkerware on their Android devices make informed choices about their anti-virus apps. We also hope that exposing the gaps that these products have in stalkerware detection will renew interest in this problem at anti-virus companies.
You can find the full results of the test here (PDF).