[B] 先端技術に基づく人類自滅の恐怖 (IV) AIの問題の続き:電力、水、雑音

1 day 6 hours ago
先にAIの問題点のいくつかを紹介しました[1]。その後も、毎日のごとく、あらゆる報道機関で、さまざまなAIに関連する問題点が議論されています。確かに、このAIは人類にとって最大の問題ですね。何しろ、我々の生き方、毎日の生活、活動などあらゆる場面で、今までは、人間は自分の頭脳を使って行っていたのだが、そうした人間の動きを、個人の頭脳ではなく、AIなる機械がやってくれることになりつつある。いや、なんとか、自分の頭脳で考えてやっていきたいと思っている人もまだいるであろうが、多くの人は、AIに依存しつつあるようである。(落合栄一郎)
日刊ベリタ

【映画の鏡】ムスリムの女性らの歴史的運動『わたしの聖なるインド』弾圧に抗う自由への信念に共感=鈴木 賀津彦<br />

1 day 14 hours ago
                 2023 Nausheen Khan 映像を見ているだけで、インド事情に疎い私のような者にも、ムスリム(イスラム教徒)の女性たちが立ち上がる姿から歴史的なムーブメントを感じさせてくれる。そして勇気と希望をもらえるドキュメンタリーだ。 ヒンドゥー教徒が約8割とされるインドで、マイノリティのイスラム教徒(約14%)の女性たちを中心に抵抗運動が巻き起こる。モディ政権が2019年12月、イスラム教徒を意図的に排除した市民権改正法を制定。市民権をはく奪..
JCJ

Internet Age-Gates Are a Growing Global Threat

2 days 10 hours ago

The internet is an essential resource for young people and adults to access information, explore community, and find themselves—both inside countries and across continents. Yet governments around the world continue to introduce and implement legislation requiring all online users to verify their ages before accessing the digital space. In some cases, politicians are going further, putting forth proposals to ban social media for younger users.  

In late 2025, Australia’s government rolled out the first complete ban on users under 16 from having social media accounts. In this sweeping regime, platforms are required to introduce age assurance tools to block under-16s, demonstrate that they have taken “reasonable steps” to deactivate accounts used by under-16s, and prevent any new accounts being created, or face fines of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars ($32 million USD). The 10 banned platforms—Instagram, Facebook, Threads, Snapchat, YouTube, TikTok, Kick, Reddit, Twitch, and X—have each said they’ll comply with the legislation, which led to young people losing access to their accounts overnight. Reddit is currently challenging the law in Australian courts on constitutional grounds. Recent research notes how the ban is preventing teenagers from accessing news in the country. 

In the United Kingdom, rules took effect in mid-2025 under the Online Safety Act that require all online services available in the country to assess whether they host content considered harmful to children; if so, these services must introduce age checks to prevent children from accessing such content. Online services are also required to change their algorithms and moderation systems to ensure that content defined as harmful, like violent imagery, is not shown to young people. 

This approach is reckless, short-sighted, and we’ve already seen it introduce more harm to the young people that it is trying to protect. The UK’s scramble to find an effective age verification method shows us that there isn't one, and we’ve spent years urging UK politicians to abandon any measures that require platforms to collect data or remove privacy protections around users’ identities. 

Earlier this year, Indonesia’s Communications and Digital Affairs Minister, Meutya Hafid, announced that users under 16 would have their accounts on “high risk” platforms deactivated from 28 March. The platforms subject to this ban are YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, X, Bigo Live, and Roblox; with Hafid noting how this policy would make Indonesia “the first non-Western country to delay children's access to digital spaces according to age.”

Similarly, the Malaysian government has recently pushed forward with plans to ban users under 16 from having accounts on social media platforms with at least 8 million users in Malaysia, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. Users under the age of 16 are being told to download or transfer their data from these platforms in one month before the restrictions are applied. Platforms failing to comply with the ban may face penalties of up to $2.5 million USD.

In Latin America, Brazil approved a new law in 2025 establishing that providers of information technology products and services directed to children and teenagers, or likely to be accessed by them, must conduct age checks when their products and services offer risks to underage users. Regulation requires age assurance for products and services that are not allowed for children and adolescents in accordance with Brazilian legislation. App stores and operating systems are required to provide age signals for other providers. 

While the law is already in force, full compliance with its obligations is expected for early 2027, after the approval of further regulations and a transition period, and the authority responsible for enforcing the law is the Brazilian National Data Protection Agency. The list of concerns regarding the implementation of the law include: the wide scope of products and services that may fall within age-check obligations, how these obligations can affect non-proprietary operating systems and free software projects, and how effective the law's crucial data protection safeguards will be in a context of likely widespread age checks for accessing content online.

Similarly, the European Union has taken large steps towards mandatory age verification that could undermine privacy, expression, and participation rights for everyone. Politicians are promoting an EU-wide approach to age verification through its age verification “app,” which will be fully interoperable with the Digital Identity Wallet. While this mini-app has been announced as technically ready to be rolled out “for citizens to use,” it comes with its own realm of potential privacy and security concerns, such as long-term identifiers (which could result in tracking) and over-exposure of personal information. 

The European Commission also supports age verification in various legislative initiatives, from proposals that would allow or mandate companies to scan our communication (“Chat Control”) to non-binding guidelines of existing laws, such as the Digital Services Act. The EU Parliament, too, has proposed an EU digital minimum age of 16 for access to social media, a move that aligns with EU Commission’s president Ursula von der Leyen’s recent public support for measures inspired by Australia’s model. To all these initiatives EFF has provided one consistent response: mandatory age verification measures are not the right way to protect young people. 

These proposals restrict the fundamental rights of young people to speak to each other and to access information. They also force all internet users, not just those under a certain age, to upload private data—like a face scan or passport—in order to access a website or service. In considering the vast scope of privacy issues pertaining to the collection, storage, and sharing of this personal information, the problems of age verification in restricting free speech are compounded by these reckless and harmful approaches to verification. 

The problem of censorship and surveillance goes far beyond the borders of the internet. EFF continues to explore support for legislative and litigation challenges that recognize how these laws harm everyone’s rights to privacy, free expression and due process.

Paige Collings

[B] 「本当に心配してますトランプさん」【西サハラ最新情報】  平田伊都子

2 days 12 hours ago
ベッセント米財務長官は5月28日、トランプにゴマをすってトランプ米大統領肖像入り建国250ドル紙幣を見せびらかしました。 米国法は、存命中の人物を紙幣に載せることを禁じています。が、トランプ氏には、米国法も議会も裁判所も、最近は閣議も関係ありません。 あるのは、自身のSNSだけです。 もっぱら、SNS政治を駆使しています。 6月2日もトランプ氏は自身のSNS<トゥルース・ソーシャル>を通じ、側近のウィリアムを国家情報長官に任命しました。 ウィリアム・パルデイ氏は全くの情報音痴です。 トランプさん、世界の庶民はあなたの頭の中を、マジ、心配してます!
日刊ベリタ

LGBT Q&A Season 1 Recap: Staying Safer Online

2 days 13 hours ago

Last year during LGBTQ+ Pride month, we launched an LGBT Q&A where we answered your most pressing digital rights questions on EFF’s Instagram and TikTok  accounts. 

Ahead of LGBT Q&A Season 2 launching next week, we’re posting a recap with some of the questions we answered. Check them out below.

  1. You wanted to know: How to stay safe when dating online.
  2. You asked: I'm a 17 year old trans woman and my address is public on the Internet. What steps can I take to mitigate this risk? 
  3. You wondered about: Tips for staying safe at Budapest Pride.
  4. You questioned: Why does homophobic content I report on social media not get removed?  
  5. You asked: What pictures are safe to use on dating apps?
  6. You wanted to know: Is it safe to have gay, trans, and Palestinian flags in my bio? 

We’re here to help build an online space where you get to decide what aspects of yourself you share with others, how you present to the world, and what things you keep private. Join us to make the internet private, safe, and full of pride.

Paige Collings

【お知らせ】 文科省に提出 同志社国際高校への「教育基本法14条2項違反認定の撤回と、教育への不当な支配をしないことを強く求める要請書」教科書問題を考える市民ネットワーク・ひろしま 日本ジャーナリスト会議(JCJ)広島支部

2 days 14 hours ago
文部科学大臣松本洋平様 教育基本法14条2項違反認定の撤回と、教育への不当な支配をしないことを強く求める要請書 今回、同志社国際高校の研修旅行中に沖縄県辺野古沖で発生した転覆事故により、研修中の生徒の尊い命が失われたことにまず心からの哀悼の意を表明いたします。特に平和学習として30年にわたって地元住民の意思に沿わない基地建設作業が進められている現場での研修において、事故の犠牲になられた生徒のご遺族にはお慰めする言葉も見つかりません。事故の原因の徹底究明がなされること、再発防止..
JCJ