日中韓自由貿易協定(FTA)交渉の第10 回交渉会合(局長/局次長会合)が開催されます
「活力あふれる『ビンテージ・ソサエティ』の実現に向けて」(研究会報告書)をとりまとめました
自動走行との連携が期待される、地図情報に関する国際規格が発行されました
東京電力株式会社の会社分割について、電気事業法に基づき認可しました
【焦点】善良な人間がなぜ虐殺に走る 「福田村」森達也監督オンライン講演 異質排除の同調圧力 メディア ゆがみ正す役割=橋詰雅博
アンチトラスト訴訟でGoogleが隠そうとした恥ずかしい証拠品とは
すべて読む | ITセクション | Google | 法廷 | IT | アメリカ合衆国 |
関連ストーリー:
Apple曰く、聞いたこともないサーチエンジンを大量に表示するのはユーザーエクスペリエンス上よくない 2023年09月30日
米司法省、Googleが違法な独占行為の証拠になる会話を避けるためのトレーニングを行っていたと主張 2023年09月20日
米政府と州、Google がアンチトラスト訴訟の証拠を隠滅したと主張して制裁を申し立て 2023年02月26日
米司法省がGoogleを反トラスト法違反の疑いで提訴、ネット広告事業の一部切り離しを求める 2023年01月26日
吉野家常務、早稲田大の社会人向け講座で不適切発言。「生娘がシャブ漬けになるような企画」 2022年04月19日
グーグルを米司法省が独禁法違反でワシントン連邦地裁提訴 90年代MS訴訟級とも 2020年10月21日
米国50の州・地域、Googleの広告ビジネスに反トラスト法違反行為が無いか調査へ 2019年09月11日
[B] 作家アルンダティ・ロイがインドのファシズムにつき世界に警鐘を鳴らす 「欧米諸国は有色人種の独裁者については黙認する傾向がある。レイシズムと違うの?」
Apple曰く、聞いたこともないサーチエンジンを大量に表示するのはユーザーエクスペリエンス上よくない
すべて読む | アップルセクション | Google | 法廷 | アップル |
関連ストーリー:
米司法省、Googleが違法な独占行為の証拠になる会話を避けるためのトレーニングを行っていたと主張 2023年09月20日
米政府と州、Google がアンチトラスト訴訟の証拠を隠滅したと主張して制裁を申し立て 2023年02月26日
米司法省がGoogleを反トラスト法違反の疑いで提訴、ネット広告事業の一部切り離しを求める 2023年01月26日
EU第一審裁判所、Googleの反競争行為に対するEUの制裁金43億ユーロを41億ユーロに減額 2022年09月17日
米司法省曰く、Google は検索エンジン 1 位の座を維持するため毎年数十億ドルを費やしている 2022年09月12日
Google が Apple の検索ビジネス参入を防ぐため収益を分け合っていると主張する訴訟 2022年01月09日
Appleは自前の検索エンジンを持つべきか 2020年06月12日
アンチトラスト訴訟でGoogleが隠そうとした恥ずかしい証拠品とは 2023年09月30日
The Growing Threat of Cybercrime Law Abuse: LGBTQ+ Rights in MENA and the UN Cybercrime Draft Convention
This is Part II of a series examining the proposed UN Cybercrime Treaty in the context of LGBTQ+ communities. Part I looks at the draft Convention’s potential implications for LGBTQ+ rights. Part II provides a closer look at how cybercrime laws might specifically impact the LGBTQ+ community and activists in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.
In the digital age, the rights of the LGBTQ+ community in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) are gravely threatened by expansive cybercrime and surveillance legislation. This reality leads to systemic suppression of LGBTQ+ identities, compelling individuals to censor themselves for fear of severe reprisal. This looming threat becomes even more pronounced in countries like Iran, where same-sex conduct is punishable by death, and Egypt, where merely raising a rainbow flag can lead to being arrested and tortured.
Enter the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention. If ratified in its present state, the convention might not only bolster certain countries' domestic surveillance powers to probe actions that some nations mislabel as crimes, but it could also strengthen and validate international collaboration grounded in these powers. Such a UN endorsement could establish a perilous precedent, authorizing surveillance measures for acts that are in stark contradiction with international human rights law. Even more concerning, it might tempt certain countries to formulate or increase their restrictive criminal laws, eager to tap into the broader pool of cross-border surveillance cooperation that the proposed convention offers.
The draft convention, in Article 35, permits each country to set its own definitions for crimes under their domestic laws for cross border policing. Alarmingly, under the draft treaty, each country will be able to set its own definitions for what crimes will serve as the foundation for requesting other countries to assist it in collecting evidence. In certain countries, many of these laws might be based on subjective moral judgments that suppress what is considered free expression in other nations, rather than adhering to universally accepted standards.
Indeed, international cooperation is permissible for crimes that carry a penalty of four years of imprisonment or more; there's a concerning move afoot to suggest reducing this threshold to merely three years. This is applicable whether the alleged offense is cyber or not. Such provisions could result in heightened cross-border monitoring and potential repercussions for individuals, leading to torture or even the death penalty in some jurisdictions.
While some countries may believe they can sidestep these pitfalls by not collaborating with countries that have controversial laws, this confidence may be misplaced. The draft treaty allows countries to refuse a request if the activity in question is not a crime in its domestic regime (the principle of "dual criminality"). However, given the current strain on the MLAT system, there's an increasing likelihood that requests, even from countries with contentious laws, could slip through the checks. This opens the door for nations to inadvertently assist in operations that might contradict global human rights norms. And where countries do share the same subjective values and problematically criminalize the same conduct, this draft treaty seemingly provides a justification for their cooperation.
One of the more recently introduced pieces of legislation that exemplifies these issues is the Cybercrime Law of 2023 in Jordan. Introduced as part of King Abdullah II’s modernization reforms to increase political participation across Jordan, this law was issued hastily and without sufficient examination of its legal aspects, social implications, and impact on human rights. In addition to this new law, the pre-existing cybercrime law in Jordan has already been used against LGBTQ+ people, and this new law expands its capacity to do so. This law, with its overly broad and vaguely defined terms, will severely restrict individual human rights across that country and will become a tool for prosecuting innocent individuals for their online speech.
Article 13 of the Jordan law expansively criminalizes a wide set of actions tied to online content branded as “pornographic,” from its creation to distribution. The ambiguity in defining what is pornographic could inadvertently suppress content that merely expresses various sexualities, mistakenly deeming them as inappropriate. This goes beyond regulating explicit material; it can suppress genuine expressions of identity. The penalty for such actions entails a period of no less than six months of imprisonment.
Meanwhile, the nebulous wording in Article 14 of Jordan's laws—terms like “expose public morals,” “debauchery,” and “seduction”—is equally concerning. Such vague language is ripe for misuse, potentially curbing LGBTQ+ content by erroneously associating diverse sexual orientation with immorality. Both articles, in their current form, cast shadows on free expression and are stark reminders that such provisions can lead to over-policing online content that is not harmful at all. During debates on the bill in the Jordanian Parliament, some MPs claimed that the new cybercrime law could be used to criminalize LGBTQ+ individuals and content online. Deputy Leader of the Opposition, Saleh al Armouti, went further and claimed that “Jordan will become a big jail.”
Additionally, the law imposes restrictions on encryption and anonymity in digital communications, preventing individuals from safeguarding their rights to freedom of expression and privacy. Article 12 of the Cybercrime Law prohibits the use of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and other proxies, with at least six months imprisonment or a fine for violations.
This will force people in Jordan to choose between engaging in free online expression or keeping their personal identity private. More specifically, this will negatively impact LGBTQ+ people and human rights defenders in Jordan who particularly rely on VPNs and anonymity to protect themselves online. The impact of Article 12 is exacerbated by the fact that there is no comprehensive data privacy legislation in Jordan to protect people’s rights during cyber attacks and data breaches.
This is not the first time Jordan has limited access to information and content online. In December 2022, Jordanian authorities blocked TikTok to prevent the dissemination of live updates and information during the workers’ protests in the country's south, and authorities there previously had blocked Clubhouse as well.
This crackdown on free speech has particularly impacted journalists, such as the recent arrest of Jordanian journalist Heba Abu Taha for criticizing Jordan’s King over his connections with Israel. Given that online platforms like TikTok and Twitter are essential for activists, organizers, journalists, and everyday people around the world to speak truth to power and fight for social justice, the restrictions placed on free speech by Jordan’s new Cybercrime Law will have a detrimental impact on political activism and community building across Jordan.
People across Jordan have protested the law and the European Union has expressed concern about how the law could limit freedom of expression online and offline. In August, EFF and 18 other civil society organizations wrote to the King of Jordan, calling for the rejection of the country’s draft cybercrime legislation. With the law now in effect, we urge Jordan to repeal the Cybercrime Law 2023.
Jordan’s Cybercrime Law has been said to be a “true copy” of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Federal Decree Law No. 34 of 2021 on Combatting Rumors and Cybercrimes. This law replaced its predecessor, which had been used to stifle expression critical of the government or its policies—and was used to sentence human rights defender Ahmed Mansoor to 10 years in prison.
The UAE’s new cybercrime law further restricts the already heavily-monitored online space and makes it harder for ordinary citizens, as well as journalists and activists, to share information online. More specifically, Article 22 mandates prison sentences of between three and 15 years for those who use the internet to share “information not authorized for publishing or circulating liable to harm state interests or damage its reputation, stature, or status.”
In September 2022, Tunisia passed its new cybercrime law in Decree-Law No. 54 on “combating offenses relating to information and communication systems.” The wide-ranging decree has been used to stifle opposition free speech, and mandates a five-year prison sentence and a fine for the dissemination of “false news” or information that harms “public security.” In the year since Decree-Law 54 was enacted, authorities in Tunisia have prosecuted media outlets and individuals for their opposition to government policies or officials.
The first criminal investigation under Decree-Law 54 saw the arrest of student Ahmed Hamada in October 2022 for operating a Facebook page that reported on clashes between law enforcement and residents of a neighborhood in Tunisia.
Similar tactics are being used in Egypt, where the 2018 cybercrime law, Law No. 175/2018, contains broad and vague provisions to silence dissent, restrict privacy rights, and target LGBTQ+ individuals. More specifically, Articles 25 and 26 have been used by the authorities to crackdown on content that allegedly violates “family values.”
Since its enactment, these provisions have also been used to target LGBTQ+ individuals across Egypt, particularly regarding the publication or sending of pornography under Article 8, as well as illegal access to an information network under Article 3. For example, in March 2022 a court in Egypt charged singers Omar Kamal and Hamo Beeka with “violating family values” for dancing and singing in a video uploaded to YouTube. In another example, police have used cybercrime laws to prosecute LGBTQ+ individuals for using dating apps such as Grindr.
And in Saudi Arabia, national authorities have used cybercrime regulations and counterterrorism legislation to prosecute online activism and stifle dissenting opinions. Between 2011 and 2015, at least 39 individuals were jailed under the pretense of counterterrorism for expressing themselves online—for composing a tweet, liking a Facebook post, or writing a blog post. And while Saudi Arabia has no specific law concerning gender identity and sexual orientation, authorities have used the 2007 Anti-Cyber Crime Law to criminalize online content and activity that is considered to impinge on “public order, religious values, public morals, and privacy.”
These provisions have been used to prosecute individuals for peaceful actions, particularly since the Arab Spring in 2011. More recently, in August 2022, Salma al-Shehab was sentenced to 34 years in prison with a subsequent 34-year travel ban for her alleged “crime” of sharing content in support of prisoners of conscience and women human rights defenders.
These cybercrime laws demonstrate that if the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention is ratified in its current form with its broad scope, it would authorize domestic surveillance for the investigation of any offenses, as those in Articles 12, 13, and 14 of Jordan's law. Additionally, the convention could authorize international cooperation for investigation of crimes penalized with three or four years of imprisonment, as seen in countries such as the UAE, Tunisia, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia.
As Canada warned (at minute 01:56 ) at the recent negotiation session, these expansive provisions in the Convention permit states to unilaterally define and broaden the scope of criminal conduct, potentially paving the way for abuse and transnational repression. While the Convention may incorporate some procedural safeguards, its far-reaching scope raises profound questions about its compatibility with the key tenets of human rights law and the principles enshrined in the UN Charter.
The root problem lies not in the severity of penalties, but in the fact that some countries criminalize behaviors and expression that are protected under international human rights law and the UN Charter. This is alarming, given that numerous laws affecting the LGBTQ+ community carry penalties within these ranges, making the potential for misuse of such cooperation profound.
In a nutshell, the proposed UN treaty amplifies the existing threats to the LGBTQ+ community. It endorses a framework where nations can surveil benign activities such as sharing LGBTQ+ content, potentially intensifying the already-precarious situation for this community in many regions.
Online, the lack of legal protection of subscriber data threatens the anonymity of the community, making them vulnerable to identification and subsequent persecution. The mere act of engaging in virtual communities, sharing personal anecdotes, or openly expressing relationships could lead to their identities being disclosed, putting them at significant risk.
Offline, the implications intensify with amplified hesitancy to participate in public events, showcase LGBTQ+ symbols, or even undertake daily routines that risk revealing their identity. The draft convention's potential to bolster digital surveillance capabilities means that even private communications, like discussions about same-sex relationships or plans for LGBTQ+ gatherings, could be intercepted and turned against them.
To all member states: This is a pivotal moment. This is our opportunity to ensure the digital future is one where rights are championed, not compromised. Pledge to protect the rights of all, especially those communities like the LGBTQ+ that are most vulnerable. The international community must unite in its commitment to ensure that the proposed convention serves as an instrument of protection, not persecution.
お絵描きボードに何が描かれているかAIが当てるゲーム「Pictionary vs AI」
すべて読む | ITセクション | グラフィック | 教育 | ゲーム | IT | おもちゃ |
関連ストーリー:
ChatGPT 開発の背後にはケニアの労働者による人力作業 2023年01月22日
Google Arts & Culture アプリの新機能「Pet Portraits」 2021年11月12日
Google、肌の色を区分する新たな尺度を開発中 2021年06月21日
マテル、髪の毛のないバービー人形を発売へ 2020年01月31日
マテル、カード上に点字を配した「UNO Braille」を発表 2019年10月06日
Googleが機械学習用データとして利用できる手書きイラスト5000万点をオープンに利用できる形で公開 2017年08月30日
ペイントのAI画像生成機能がCanary/Devチャネルでロールアウト、日本で利用するには?
すべて読む | ITセクション | グラフィック | 人工知能 | Windows | IT |
関連ストーリー:
Windows 11 バージョン22H2の新機能、Release Previewチャネルで提供開始 2023年09月24日
Windows 11、Canary/Devチャネルの「ペイント」にレイヤーと透明色のサポートが追加 2023年09月21日
Windows 11、Canary/Devチャネルの「ペイント」に背景削除機能が追加 2023年09月09日
Windowsのワードパッド、使ってる? 2023年09月03日
WindowsのペイントにAI機能、必要?不要?どんな機能なら使いたい? 2023年08月28日
石垣島住民投票当事者訴訟、控訴審はじまる 「我がこととして考えて」(原告)
[B] もうすぐチャリティ終了 ベトナム人技能実習生の支援に向けて
[B] 「不思議な王様ムハンマド六世」【西サハラ最新情報】 平田伊都子
[B] 本日、東京・渋谷でれいわ新撰組の増税反対デモ
[B] 【入管問題】名古屋入管死亡事件 入管幹部再び不起訴 国賠訴訟では国側が医師の意見書提出
【映画の鏡】これが日本の現実だ『国葬の日』リベラルに欠けた視点を提示=鈴木賀津彦
Regulating the use of digital technology by public administration to protect and strengthen human rights
This contribution to the World Public Sector Report 2023, published by the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, builds on analytical research led by APC for the 2021-2022 edition of the Global Information Society Watch report, which explored digital futures for a post-pandemic world.
LINEで「。」を使わない人が多いのはなぜ?
すべて読む | ITセクション | 変なモノ | SNS |
関連ストーリー:
奇想天外なパスワード規則のウェブサイトを掲載する『Dumb Password Rules』 2023年02月21日
「テキストの内容と句読点を変更する」という新たな電子透かし技術が開発される 2013年06月21日