【6月出版界の動き】 出版・アニメ界「AIによる権利侵害」へ声明

1 month 2 weeks ago
◆紙出版物販売金額765億円(前年同月比5.6%減) 書籍478億9400万円(同3.7%減)、雑誌286億300万円(同8.5%減)。雑誌の内訳は月刊誌が同9.5%減、週刊誌が同1.9%減。返品率は書籍が同0.5ポイント増の29.1%、雑誌は同1.1ポイント増の49.1%。 書店店頭での売れ行きは、書籍がほぼ前年並みで、文芸書約8%増、文庫本約4%増、学参ほぼ前年なみ、ビジネス書約1%減、児童書約6%減、新書本約6%増、書籍扱いコミックス約1%減。雑誌は定期誌が約1%増、雑..
JCJ

Welcome New EFF Executive Director Nicole Ozer

1 month 2 weeks ago

EFF welcomes our new Executive Director Nicole Ozer today! 

Nicole is a legal expert on privacy and surveillance, artificial intelligence, and digital speech who previously served as the inaugural executive director of the Center for Constitutional Democracy at UC Law San Francisco. From 2004-2025, she was founding director of the Technology and Civil Liberties Program at the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

Nicole has long been a partner of EFF’s in the fight to defend civil liberties in the digital world. Many of us already know her, and she’s basically as close to EFF “family” as someone can be without actually having worked here.   

Over her more than two decades leading public interest technology work, Nicole has:  

  • spearheaded passage of the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act – working with EFF to enact the nation’s strongest electronic surveillance law, requiring a warrant for government access to electronic information; 
  • modernized California law to protect reading records in the digital age by helping, along with EFF, to craft the Reader Privacy Act, requiring a “super warrant” for government access; 
  • created a groundbreaking model law for local democratic oversight of surveillance systems which inspired 25 laws across the country that help safeguard the rights and safety of more than 17 million people; 
  • litigated civil liberties cases, including work with EFF on the NSA cases, and drafted influential amicus briefs on technology issues at all levels of state and federal court, including the U.S. Supreme Court and California Supreme Court; and 
  • developed multi-year campaigns to strengthen the anti-surveillance policies related to social media surveillance and face recognition of major technology companies and foster stronger privacy and free expression protection for billions of people worldwide. 

And that's just the TL;DR! You can read more about her bona fides here

EFF’s work to ensure technology supports freedom, justice, and innovation is more urgent than ever. And with Nicole’s decades of leadership in public interest technology work, EFF is poised to be stronger than ever to meet this moment and build for the fights ahead. 

Nicole succeeds Cindy Cohn, who has been with EFF for more than 25 years and served as executive director since 2015. Cindy is leaving EFF later this month – not to retire, but to find a role that puts her back in the courtroom doing what she does best: suing the government! She’ll still be part of the EFF community. 

We are living digital lives, using technology to connect, communicate, and mobilize for change. And we need you in these critical fights to defend and advance rights in the digital world – so join EFF today, and sign up for our EFFector newsletter to make sure you’re updated on the latest EFF news including upcoming events to help you get to know Nicole. 

Welcome Nicole! 

Josh Richman

[B] 「平和の少女」が見た世界、世界から見た日本 〜ドイツ報告を中心に〜インタヴュー講座「脱植民地主義のために」第3回レポート

1 month 2 weeks ago
2026年5月16日、日本帝国主義の歴史を捉え直し、植民地主義的な構造を考えるインタビュー講座「脱植民地主義のために」の第3回が、東京ボランティア市民活動センターで開催された。関東大震災における朝鮮人虐殺や女性国際戦犯法廷をテーマにした過去2回に続き、今回は「表現の不自由展・東京」共同代表で編集者・ジャーナリストの岡本有佳氏が登壇。(小栗俊也)
日刊ベリタ

【フォトアングル】戦闘機「雷電」のレプリカを展示、旧海軍地下工場跡地訪ねる=5月4日、神奈川県座間市、伊東良平撮影

1 month 2 weeks ago
 神奈川県には旧日本海軍遺構が今も残る。GWの一日、外国人住民基本法の制定を求める神奈川キリスト者連絡会主催のツアーに参加し、戦時中に戦闘機「雷電」128機が生産され、レプリカが展示された旧高座海軍工廠の地下工場跡や近くの寺にある戦没台湾少年慰霊碑などを訪ねた。 地下工場の防空壕は強制労働の史跡でもあり、朝鮮出身の労働者によって掘られた。また「雷電」の生産には12歳から18歳までの「少年工」約8400人が台湾から動員され、過酷な環境下で従事した。     JCJ月刊機関紙「ジ..
JCJ

【焦点】ジャーナリストの池上彰氏が「究極のインサイダー取引」とトランプ米大統領を指弾 法規制なく金儲けやり放題=橋詰雅博

1 month 2 weeks ago
  不動産売買で財を成したトランプ米大統領はやはり金儲け主義が染みついており、大統領という地位を利用し私腹を肥やす強欲な人間のようだ。 米政府倫理局(OGE)が14日に公表したトランプ大統領の資産報告書によると、トランプは、2026年1月から3月期における株式売買などの取引は3700件以上で、前年同期比の10倍にものぼった。米国とイスラエルが仕掛けた3月のイラン戦争後、取引が急増している。 5月27日付日経新聞によると、同期間は、アルファベット、メタなど巨大テック企業の株を売..
JCJ

One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: CA's AB 1856 Exempts Open Source But Expands Age-Gating

1 month 2 weeks ago

After public outrage, California lawmakers are moving closer to exempting open-source operating systems from the sweeping age-bracketing regime mandated by last year’s Digital Age Assurance Act (AB 1043). Nonetheless, the current bill still jeopardizes internet users’ speech, privacy, and security.

While the open source exemption, if passed, would improve the law, the remaining amendments proposed by AB 1856 would require all web browsers and websites to request and collect users’ ages. This is an expansion of last year's AB 1043's age-bracketing system that compounds its constitutional harms to users’ speech, privacy, and security. As AB 1856 moves on to the Senate, EFF will continue fighting for amendments that reduce those harms.

AB 1856 Extends AB 1043’s Age-Gating Regime

Last year, California passed AB 1043, which requires all operating systems and app stores to create age-bracketing systems that segment users based on their ages. As we’ve written, that regime is a recipe for censorship: it creates unnecessary and unconstitutional barriers to accessing lawful online speech, threatens our right to anonymity, and pressures online services to collect troves of valuable and sensitive user data. On top of that, A.B. 1043’s wide-sweeping compliance burdens impose disproportionate harms on the open-source ecosystem that underpins much of the modern web. 

Given these flaws, lawmakers introduced AB 1856 this year as a supposed “clean-up” bill for AB 1043. But instead of sticking to fixing AB 1043’s unique and serious harms (like its impact on open-source operating systems), AB 1856 also expanded the regime even further—extending its age-bracketing requirements beyond operating systems and app stores to browsers and websites. 

EFF opposed AB 1856 on two grounds, which we explained in our opposition letter to the Assembly: 

  1. The harms that age-gating regimes pose to users’ speech, privacy, and anonymity; and
  2. The disproportionate harms that this particular regime imposes on open-source developers. 
Open Source Concerns Somewhat Alleviated By Amendment

On May 28th, AB 1856 passed the Assembly in a nearly unanimous vote (68-1). 

Before that vote, however, AB 1856 was amended to relieve the compliance burden on open-source operating systems. This is a meaningful improvement and a welcome relief for open-source developers, who have been loud and clear about how much of an existential threat A.B. 1043’s age-gating mandate would pose.

The new exception reads:

“Operating system provider” does not mean a person or entity that distributes an operating system or application under license terms that permit a recipient to copy, redistribute, and modify the software.”

EFF understands this amendment to exempt open-source operating systems from the requirement to collect and transmit users’ age-bracket data. That is a definite win for open-source developers. The bill is narrower now than it was before, and lawmakers clearly responded to concerns raised by EFF and the broader open-source community. 

Some important questions still remain—for example, it is unclear how the law would apply when an open-source operating system is incorporated into a commercial product or service. And, given the structure of where the exemption is placed under the “operating system provider” definition, lawmakers could stand to clarify that the exemption applies to open-source operating systems and applications.

Nonetheless, that ambiguity aside, this amendment does substantially reduce the threat that AB 1043 could have on many open-source developers. 

AB 1856 Still Expands the Problematic Age-Bracketing Regime

Don’t get us wrong—if this bill passes, we will be very happy that AB 1043 does not pose nearly the amount of harm to our friends behind open-source operating systems. But even after these amendments, EFF remains opposed to AB 1856 because it ultimately expands California’s sweeping age-bracketing framework far beyond the original scope of AB 1043. 

In AB 1856 and its amendments, the Assembly failed to address the core problem with AB 1043’s age-bracketing regime: mandated age-gating systems threaten users’ speech, privacy, anonymity, and security. 

Even after these amendments, EFF remains opposed to AB 1856 because it ultimately expands California’s sweeping age-bracketing framework far beyond the original scope of AB 1043. 

Even though AB 1043 does not explicitly require companies to perform age verification, it nonetheless imposes a liability structure that strongly pressures companies to verify users’ ages anyway. In practice, that could lead to more ID checks, more biometric scanning, more invasive data collection and risk of breach, and more barriers to adults’ and young people’s lawful speech.

In fact, instead of narrowing AB 1043’s wide net, AB 1856 expanded it to add browser providers and website operators to the list of entities that must comply with its age-bracketing requirements. This dramatically broadens the scope of AB 1043 and pulls more services, developers, and users into an anonymity- and privacy-destroying data collection framework that has not yet been implemented or evaluated. The result would make it nearly impossible for regular internet users to avoid AB 1043’s age gates.

The Fight Moves to the Senate

On those grounds, EFF will continue to oppose AB 1856. Though it has passed the Assembly, the fight is not over. As the bill moves through the Senate, we’ll continue to push for amendments that actually “clean up” and narrow the scope of AB 1043, and offer more protection to users from the harms of age-gating systems.

Molly Buckley