Aggregator

非常時における事業者間ローミング等に関する検討会（第12回）開催案内

4.9GHz帯における第5世代移動通信システムの利用に関する調査の実施

令和6年度の電話リレーサービス提供機関及び電話リレーサービス支援機関の事業計画書等の認可

情報通信審議会 情報通信技術分科会 技術戦略委員会（第47回）開催案内

令和5年度補正予算「デジタル活用支援推進事業」全国展開型・講師派遣型での事業実施団体の公募

令和6年能登半島地震に係る被害状況等について（第88報）

松本総務大臣閣議後記者会見の概要

デジタル空間における情報流通の健全性確保の在り方に関する検討会（第12回）配付資料　※ワーキンググループ（第7回）合同開催

情報通信審議会　情報通信技術分科会　新世代モバイル通信システム委員会　ローカル5G検討作業班（第20回）

Court after court has recognized that no one can own the text of the law. But the Pro Codes Act is a deceptive power grab that will help giant industry associations ration access to huge swaths of U.S. laws. Tell Congress not to fall for it.

What do House Democrats like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Barbara Lee have in common with House Republicans like Thomas Massie and Andy Biggs? Not a lot. But they do know an unconstitutional bill when they see one.

These and others on both sides of the aisle were among the 65 House Members who voted "no" yesterday on the “Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act,” H.R. 7521, which would effectively ban TikTok. The bill now goes to the Senate, where we hope cooler heads will prevail in demanding comprehensive data privacy legislation instead of this attack on Americans' First Amendment rights.

We're saying plenty about this misguided, unfounded bill, and we want you to speak out about it too, but we thought you should see what some of the House Members who opposed it said, in their own words.

 

I am voting NO on the TikTok ban.

Rather than target one company in a rushed and secretive process, Congress should pass comprehensive data privacy protections and do a better job of informing the public of the threats these companies may pose to national security.

— Rep. Barbara Lee (@RepBarbaraLee) March 13, 2024

   ___________________ 

Today, I voted against the so-called “TikTok Bill.”

Here’s why: pic.twitter.com/Kbyh6hEhhj

gilc15axuaahok9.jpg

— Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) March 13, 2024

   ___________________

Today, I voted against H.R. 7521. My full statement: pic.twitter.com/9QCFQ2yj5Q

nadler.png

— Rep. Nadler (@RepJerryNadler) March 13, 2024

   ___________________ 

Today I claimed 20 minutes in opposition to the TikTok ban bill, and yielded time to several likeminded colleagues.

This bill gives the President far too much authority to determine what Americans can see and do on the internet.

This is my closing statement, before I voted No. pic.twitter.com/xMxp9bU18t

massie.mp4

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) March 13, 2024

   ___________________ 

Why I voted no on the bill to potentially ban tik tok: pic.twitter.com/OGkfdxY8CR

himes.jpg

— Jim Himes 🇺🇸🇺🇦 (@jahimes) March 13, 2024

   ___________________ 

I don’t use TikTok. I find it unwise to do so. But after careful review, I’m a no on this legislation.

This bill infringes on the First Amendment and grants undue power to the administrative state. pic.twitter.com/oSpmYhCrV8

bishop.mp4

— Rep. Dan Bishop (@RepDanBishop) March 13, 2024

   ___________________ 

I’m voting NO on the TikTok forced sale bill.

This bill was incredibly rushed, from committee to vote in 4 days, with little explanation.

There are serious antitrust and privacy questions here, and any national security concerns should be laid out to the public prior to a vote.

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) March 13, 2024

   ___________________ 

We should defend the free & open debate that our First Amendment protects. We should not take that power AWAY from the people & give it to the government. The answer to authoritarianism is NOT more authoritarianism. The answer to CCP-style propaganda is NOT CCP-style oppression. pic.twitter.com/z9HWgUSMpw
mcclintock.mp4

— Tom McClintock (@RepMcClintock) March 13, 2024

   ___________________ 

I'm voting no on the TikTok bill. Here's why:
1) It was rushed.
2) There's major free speech issues.
3) It would hurt small businesses.
4) America should be doing way more to protect data privacy & combatting misinformation online. Singling out one app isn't the answer.

— Rep. Jim McGovern (@RepMcGovern) March 13, 2024

    ___________________

Solve the correct problem.
Privacy.
Surveillance.
Content moderation.

Who owns #TikTok?
60% investors - including Americans
20% +7,000 employees - including Americans
20% founders
CEO & HQ Singapore
Data in Texas held by Oracle

What changes with ownership? I’ll be voting NO. pic.twitter.com/MrfROe02IS

davidson.mp4

— Warren Davidson 🇺🇸 (@WarrenDavidson) March 13, 2024

   ___________________ 

I voted no on the bill to force the sale of TikTok. Unlike our adversaries, we believe in freedom of speech and don’t ban social media platforms. Instead of this rushed bill, we need comprehensive data security legislation that protects all Americans.

— Val Hoyle (@RepValHoyle) March 13, 2024

    ___________________

Please tell the Senate to reject this bill and instead give Americans the comprehensive data privacy protections we so desperately need.

TAKE ACTION

TELL CONGRESS: DON'T BAN TIKTOK

　　政府は２月７日、経済、技術分野にも秘密保護の「適正評価」(セキュリティ・クリアランス＝SC)制度を広げ、秘密保護法の適用対象を拡大して民間事業者も含めることを柱とする改正案を示し自民党部会も了承した。　秘密保護法は２０１４年、防衛、外交、スパイ防止、テロ防止の４分野について「特定秘密」を規定し、公務員などの「秘密の取り扱い者」を指定して安全保障に著しい支障を与える（情報）漏えいを防ぐとして成立した。実施状況は、毎年報告されるが、常に表現の自由やプライバシーとの兼ね合いにつ..

国内の有力消費者団体と非戦を掲げる市民団体が協力して武器輸出を進める三菱重工と三菱電機を対象に武器輸出中止を求める不買運動やハガキアクションを実行する。消費者団体は日本消費者連盟（日消連）と主婦連合会（主婦連）。市民団体は武器取引反対ネットワーク（NAJAT）。三団体は３月２１日、三菱重工と三菱電機前で要請書提出などを行った後、記者会見を行う。（大野和興）

三菱電機製MELSECシリーズのCPUユニットには、バッファオーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。

Apache Tomcatには複数のサービス運用妨害（DoS）の脆弱性が存在します。