【焦点】著作者人格権奪う世田谷区に見直し求める要望書第二弾を提出、29日まで回答を=橋詰雅博

1 month 2 weeks ago
 世田谷区史の刊行をめぐり区と対立する執筆予定だった青山学院大学文学部史学科準教授・谷口雄太氏の支援などを目的とした「世田谷区史のあり方ついて考える区民の会」は、区に2月27日に提出した著作権譲渡契約書の見直しを求める要望書に対する区の5日の回答書に「失望した」として3月22日に再び要望書を保坂展人区長に提出した。回答書の「経緯」説明の部分には、執筆者が「委員会」と3カ月にわたってやりとりしたなど看過しえない事実誤認があると指摘している。対話の場を設けてほしいと29日までに回..
JCJ

【オピニオン】図書館の民営化の問題・元JCJ賞選考委員 清田義昭=出版部会

1 month 2 weeks ago
 2020年に廃業した出版ニュース社で五十数年仕事をした。出版界の業界誌で『出版年鑑』哉雑誌『出版ニュース』を刊行してきた。読者対象は学校や図書館も含まれる。わたしが編集しているあいだの方針は「出版の自由は出版流通の自由なくしてありえない」という理念であった。出版・表現をもとにした表現物(著作物)は、読者に届いてはじめて存在理由・価値があると考えるからだ。 こうした視座で業界ウオッチングをつづけた。出版をめぐる問題は山積していてそれをどう解決するかが日々の仕事であった。近年、..
JCJ

「学校現場で”汚染水”使うな」福島県議会がトンデモ意見書採択 主導したのは自民「統一協会」汚染県議

1 month 2 weeks ago
 学校教育の現場で「汚染水」の用語を使うな−−いわゆる「ALPS処理水」なるものは「安全」だとして福島第1原発から出るALPS汚染水の海洋投棄を進める国・東京電力。その方針に学校教育現場の教職員を従わせようとする「トンデモ意見書」が2月28日、福島県議会に提出された。福島県民有志はこの間、意見書の採択をしないよう、この問題を担当する県議会商労文教委員会所属県議に対する要請行動や署名提出などあらゆる行動を続けてきた。だが、こうした努力にもかかわらず、意見書は3月18日に委員会で、また県議会最終日となる19日には本会議で、自民などの賛成多数で採択された。事の発端は1月下旬、日教組(日本教職員組合)が札幌市で開催した教研集会にさかのぼる。教研集会はコロナ禍のため過去3年、オンライン開催が続いてきたが、今年、4年ぶりの集合形式での開催に戻った。その集会で、神奈川県内の中学校教員が汚染水の用語を使った教育実践例を報告。地元との同意がない限り、汚染水を放出しないとの約束を反故にして、国・東京電力が放出を強行したという正しい内容を教えるものだった。(黒鉄好)

Responding to ShotSpotter, Police Shoot at Child Lighting Fireworks

1 month 2 weeks ago

This post was written by Rachel Hochhauser, an EFF legal intern

We’ve written multiple times about the inaccurate and dangerous “gunshot detection” tool, Shotspotter. A recent near-tragedy in Chicago adds to the growing pile of evidence that cities should drop the product.

On January 25, while responding to a ShotSpotter alert, a Chicago police officer opened fire on an unarmed “maybe 14 or 15” year old child in his backyard. Three officers approached the boy’s house, with one asking “What you doing bro, you good?” They heard a loud bang, later determined to be fireworks, and shot at the child. Fortunately, no physical injuries were recorded. In initial reports, police falsely claimed that they fired at a “man” who had fired on officers.

In a subsequent assessment of the event, the Chicago Civilian Office of Police Accountability (“COPA”) concluded that “a firearm was not used against the officers.” Chicago Police Superintendent Larry Snelling placed all attending officers on administrative duty for 30 days and is investigating whether the officers violated department policies.

ShotSpotter is the largest company which produces and distributes audio gunshot detection for U.S. cities and police departments. Currently, it is used by 100 law enforcement agencies. The system relies on sensors positioned on buildings and lamp posts, which purportedly detect the acoustic signature of a gunshot. The information is then forwarded to humans who purportedly have the expertise to verify whether the sound was gunfire (and not, for example, a car backfiring), and whether to deploy officers to the scene.

ShotSpotter claims that its technology is “97% accurate,” a figure produced by the marketing department and not engineers. The recent Chicago shooting shows this is not accurate. Indeed, a 2021 study in Chicago found that, in a period of 21 months, ShotSpotter resulted in police acting on dead-end reports over 40,000 times. Likewise, the Cook County State’s Attorney’s office concluded that ShotSpotter had “minimal return on investment” and only resulted in arrest for 1% of proven shootings, according to a recent CBS report. The technology is predominantly used in Black and Latinx neighborhoods, contributing to the over-policing of these areas. Police responding to ShotSpotter arrive at the scenes expecting gunfire and are on edge and therefore more likely to draw their firearms.

Finally, these sensors invade the right to privacy. Even in public places, people often have a reasonable expectation of privacy and therefore a legal right not to have their voices recorded. But these sound sensors risk the capture and leaking of private conversation. In People v. Johnson in California, a court held such recordings from ShotSpotter to be admissible evidence.

In February, Chicago’s Mayor announced that the city would not be renewing its contract with Shotspotter. Many other cities have cancelled or are considering cancelling use of the tool.

This technology endangers lives, disparately impacts communities of color, and encroaches on the privacy rights of individuals. It has a history of false positives and poses clear dangers to pedestrians and residents. It is urgent that these inaccurate and harmful systems be removed from our streets.

Adam Schwartz