Aggregator

エクストライノベーション株式会社が提供するacmailer CGIおよびacmailer DBには、OSコマンドインジェクションの脆弱性が存在します。

日本電気株式会社が提供するAtermシリーズには、複数の脆弱性が存在します。

ORingが提供するIAP-420には、複数の脆弱性が存在します。

mySCADAが提供するmyPRO Managerには、複数の脆弱性が存在します。

Outback Powerが提供するMojave Inverterには、複数の脆弱性が存在します。

東海第二原発は、東日本大震災で大きな揺れに襲われ、その後も余震などで繰り返し揺さぶられてきた。そのため施設、設備には大きな損傷がなくても、電源系統、特に接点に力が掛かったり、腐食で加熱発火するなどが起こり続けていると考えられる。

The objective of this research is to identify and provide an assessment of emerging issues in the digital rights landscape in Africa.

大都市における行政課題への対応に関するワーキンググループ（第3回）

村上総務大臣閣議後記者会見の概要

株式会社海外通信・放送・郵便事業支援機構の対象事業支援決定の認可

労働力調査（詳細集計）2024年（令和6年）10〜12月期平均及び2024年（令和6年）平均

シンポジウム「安心・安全なメタバースの利活用促進を考える」の開催

電気通信紛争処理委員会（第248回）の開催について

令和6年度 起業家甲子園・起業家万博の開催

情報通信審議会　郵政政策部会　郵便料金政策委員会（第8回）　開催案内

第128回産業統計部会

　昨年秋以降、ＮＨＫのドキュメンタリーの健闘が光る。１１月３０日の『ＥＴＶ特集　誰のための医療か～群大病院・模索の１０年～』は、２０１４年に医療事故が発覚して大問題となった群馬大学附属病院のその後を見つめた。腹腔鏡手術で８人、開腹手術でも１０人の患者が死亡した事態を受け、事故調査委員会は徹底した医療安全の改革を提言した。以後１０年、病院は、重大事例について科を超えた合同カンファレンスで検討する、カルテ情報を患者と共有するなど、前例のない改革を進めてきた。さらに、患者自らが医療..

As President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order in 2020 to retaliate against online services that fact-checked him, a team within the Department of Justice (DOJ) was finalizing a proposal to substantially weaken a key law that protects internet users’ speech.

Documents released to EFF as part of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) suit reveal that the DOJ officials—a self-described “Tiger Team”—were caught off guard by Trump’s retaliatory effort, which was aimed at the same online social services they wanted to regulate further by amending 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Section 230).

Section 230 protects users’ online speech by protecting the online intermediaries we all rely on to communicate on blogs, social media platforms, and educational and cultural platforms like Wikipedia and the Internet Archive. Section 230 embodies that principle that we should all be responsible for our own actions and statements online, but generally not those of others. The law prevents most civil suits against users or services that are based on what others say.

The correspondence among DOJ officials shows that the group delayed unveiling the agency’s official plans to amend Section 230 in light of Trump’s executive order, which was challenged on First Amendment grounds and later rescinded by President Joe Biden. EFF represented the groups who challenged Trump’s Executive Order and filed two FOIA suits for records about the administration’s implementation of the order.

In the most recent FOIA case, the DOJ has been slowly releasing records detailing its work to propose amendments to Section 230, which predated Trump’s Executive Order. The DOJ released the text of its proposed amendments to Section 230 in September 2020, and the proposal would have substantially narrowed the law’s protections.

For example, the DOJ’s proposal would have allowed federal civil suits and state and federal criminal prosecutions against online services if they learned that users’ content broke the law. It also would have established notice-and-takedown liability for user-generated content that was deemed to be illegal. Together, these provisions would likely result in online services screening and removing a host of legal content, based on a fear that any questionable material might trigger liability later.

The DOJ’s proposal had a distinct emphasis on imposing liability on services should they have hosted illegal content posted by their users. That focus was likely the result of the team DOJ assembled to work on the proposal, which included officials from the agency’s cybercrime division and the FBI.

The documents also show that DOJ officials met with attorneys who brought lawsuits against online services to get their perspective on Section 230. This is not surprising, as the DOJ had been meeting with multiple groups throughout 2020 while it prepared a report about Section 230.

EFF’s FOIA suit is ongoing, as the DOJ has said that it still has thousands of potential pages to review and possibly release. Although these documents reflect DOJ’s activity from Trump’s first term, they are increasingly relevant as the administration appoints officials who have previously threatened online intermediaries for exercising their own First Amendment rights. EFF will continue to publish all documents released in this FOIA suit and push back on attempts to undermine internet users’ rights to speak online.