Aggregator

Today, EFF joined a coalition of civil society organizations in urging UN Member States not to sign the UN Convention Against Cybercrime. For those that move forward despite these warnings, we urge them to take immediate and concrete steps to limit the human rights harms this Convention will unleash. These harms are likely to be severe and will be extremely difficult to prevent in practice.

The Convention obligates states to establish broad electronic surveillance powers to investigate and cooperate on a wide range of crimes—including those unrelated to information and communication systems—without adequate human rights safeguards. It requires governments to collect, obtain, preserve, and share electronic evidence with foreign authorities for any “serious crime”—defined as an offense punishable under domestic law by at least four years’ imprisonment (or a higher penalty).

In many countries, merely speaking freely; expressing a nonconforming sexual orientation or gender identity; or protesting peacefully can constitute a serious criminal offense per the definition of the convention. People have faced lengthy prison terms, or even more severe acts like torture, for criticizing their governments on social media, raising a rainbow flag, or criticizing a monarch. 

In today’s digital era, nearly every message or call generates granular metadata—revealing who communicates with whom, when, and from where—that routinely traverses national borders through global networks. The UN cybercrime convention, as currently written, risks enabling states to leverage its expansive cross-border data-access and cooperation mechanisms to obtain such information for political surveillance—abusing the Convention’s mechanisms to monitor critics, pressure their families, and target marginalized communities abroad.

As abusive governments increasingly rely on questionable tactics to extend their reach beyond their borders—targeting dissidents, activists, and journalists worldwide—the UN Cybercrime Convention risks becoming a vehicle for globalizing repression, enabling an unprecedented multilateral infrastructure for digital surveillance that allows states to access and exchange data across borders in ways that make political monitoring and targeting difficult to detect or challenge.

EFF has long sounded the alarm over the UN Cybercrime Treaty’s sweeping powers of cross-border cooperation and its alarming lack of human-rights safeguards. As the Convention opens for signature on October 25–26, 2025 in Hanoi, Vietnam—a country repeatedly condemned by international rights groups for jailing critics and suppressing online speech—the stakes for global digital freedom have never been higher.

The Convention’s many flaws cannot easily be mitigated because it fundamentally lacks a mechanism for suspending states that systematically fail to respect human rights or the rule of law. States must refuse to sign or ratify the Convention. 

Read our full letter here.

総務大臣政務官就任記者会見の概要

総務副大臣就任記者会見の概要

第752回　入札監理小委員会（開催案内）

不適正利用対策に関するワーキンググループ（第11回）

AIセキュリティ分科会（第4回）開催案内

高市早苗首相は、24日の所信表明演説では触れなかったが、自民・維新の「連立政権合意書」では、「スパイ防止法」制定を明記している。この法律の危険性は、太平洋戦争開戦の1941年12月8日に起きた北大生・宮澤弘幸「スパイ冤罪事件」に示されている。市民団体「事件の真相を広める会」は、戦争体制化が進む現政権下でおなじ悲劇を繰り返してはならないと、同法の阻止をめざして『「12月8日」を記憶し続ける』を発刊した。（福島清）

　台湾有事を巡る中国の出方について米政権内の見方は二つに分かれている。トランプ大統領は、１０月２０日、記者団から中国軍が台湾に侵攻する可能性を問われ「中国はそんなことはしたくないだろう」と答えた。そのうえで「習国家主席にそうした様子はまったくみられない」「台湾は彼にとって非常に重要な存在だろうが、何かが起こるとは思わない」と述べた。一方、米情報機関は２０２７年までに中国軍が台湾に侵攻できる能力を保有すると分析。これを根拠に侵攻の可能性は高いという武力行使説は少数派だが、根強く..

　リベラル派の若き旗手として政界に躍り出た辻元清美氏も、もう還暦を越えた。今や重鎮政治家として日本の舵取りを担うべき地位にいる。彼女が対談相手に選んだのが日刊現代第一編集局長の小塚かおる氏。日頃から息が合う友人関係だから日本政治の奥深い闇を徹底的に語り合える。　辻元氏が珍しく弱音を吐いているのも、心を許した相手だからだろう。　彼女が国会を舞台にした「飲み食い政治」を拒 否し、新しい風を吹かせたことも有権者の記憶に残る。その記憶をもう一度確かめながら、新しい日本の在り方を探る。..