Protecting “Free Speech” Can’t Just Be About Targeting Political Opponents

3 months 2 weeks ago

The White House executive order “restoring freedom of speech and ending federal censorship,” published Monday, misses the mark on truly protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights. 

The order calls for an investigation of efforts under the Biden administration to “moderate, deplatform, or otherwise suppress speech,” especially on social media companies. It goes on to order an Attorney General investigation of any government activities “over the last 4 years” that are inconsistent with the First Amendment. The order states in part: 

Under the guise of combatting “misinformation,” “disinformation,” and “malinformation,” the Federal Government infringed on the constitutionally protected speech rights of American citizens across the United States in a manner that advanced the Government’s preferred narrative about significant matters of public debate.

But noticeably absent from the Executive Order is any commitment to government transparency. In the Santa Clara Principles, a guideline for online content moderation authored by EFF and other civil society groups, we state that “governments and other state actors should themselves report their involvement in content moderation decisions, including data on demands or requests for content to be actioned or an account suspended, broken down by the legal basis for the request." This Executive Order doesn’t come close to embracing such a principle. 

The order is also misguided in its time-limited targeting. Informal government efforts to persuade, cajole, or strong-arm private media platforms, also called “jawboning,” have been an aspect of every U.S. government since at least 2011. Any good-faith inquiry into such pressures would not be limited to a single administration. It’s misleading to suggest the previous administration was the only, or even the primary, source of such pressures. This time limit reeks of political vindictiveness, not a true effort to limit improper government actions. 

To be clear, a look back at past government involvement in online content moderation is a good thing. But an honest inquiry would not be time-limited to the actions of a political opponent, nor limited to only past actions. The public would also be better served by a report that had a clear deadline, and a requirement that the results be made public, rather than sent only to the President’s office. Finally, the investigation would be better placed with an inspector general, not the U.S. Attorney General, which implies possible prosecutions. 

As we have written before, the First Amendment forbids the government from coercing private entities to censor speech. This principle has countered efforts to pressure intermediaries like bookstores and credit card processors to limit others’ speech. But not every communication about user speech is unconstitutional; some are beneficial, like when platforms reach out to government agencies as authoritative sources of information. 

For anyone who may have been excited to see a first-day executive order truly focused on free expression, President Trump’s Jan. 20 order is a disappointment, at best. 

Joe Mullin

〈ドキュメンタリー映画の祭典〉想田和弘

3 months 2 weeks ago
 オランダのアムステルダム国際ドキュメンタリー映画祭(IDFA)に参加した。世界でも最大のドキュメンタリー映画祭で、約100カ国から約3000人のドキュメンタリー映画関係者と、約30万人の観客が集う。  今回僕は『五香宮 […]
admin

「自民一強」時代の終わりの始まり

3 months 2 weeks ago
 2024年10月27日に行なわれた衆院選では、自民、公明の与党が、過半数割れし、09年以来の歴史的大敗を喫した。 「政治とカネ」の問題に対して自浄能力のない政権与党に、主権者である国民が、審判を下したものと言える。   […]
admin

[B] バムルン・カヨタとその時代 アジアグローバリゼーションに対峙したタイ農民運動者を偲んで(下)

3 months 2 weeks ago
1990年代、経済成長の軌跡に入ったタイ社会。多くの困難が小農民を、スラム住民を、労働者を襲った。そんな中、小農民運動のリーダーとして登場したバムルン・カヨタ―はいつも運動の先頭に立ち、政府と対峙する。そこに、世界を覆うグローバリゼーションの波がかぶさる。「上」ではその状況を見た。グローバル化はタイの農業構造を大きく変えた。(大野和興)
日刊ベリタ

Weekly Report: 複数のマイクロソフト製品に脆弱性

3 months 2 weeks ago
複数のマイクロソフト製品には、脆弱性があります。同社は、今回修正された一部の脆弱性を悪用する攻撃をすでに確認しているとのことです。この問題は、Microsoft Updateなどを用いて、更新プログラムを適用することで解決します。詳細は、開発者が提供する情報を参照してください。