[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fire Glickman
Is our Secretary of Agriculture, Dan Glickman, not criminally liable
of releasing dangerously misleading information. There is no way that
his conclusion
<http://flash.al.com/cgi-bin/al_nview.pl?/home1/wire/AP/
Stream-Parsed/FINANCIAL/f0015_PM_Year2000 > that Y2K will not disrupt
food supplies and that people should not stockpile food can have any
factual backing. This is equivalent to shouting fire in a crowded
theatre, or announcing to those in a coastal city being approached by
a hurricane that it will not come ashore. Minimally, Clinton should
fire Glickman -- and use the act to announce to the public that Y2K
should be of concern to everyone. Is a letter/email campaign to
Clinton appropriate? Are there any lawyers who might make a case
against Glickman -- possibly to bring focus on the irresponsible
statements of our leaders -- to force the issue to courts where the
evidence (or lack of evidence) could be presented and debated?
--------------------------------------------------------
Laurence J. Victor / Larry / et
<http://azstarnet.com/~nuu>http://azstarnet.com/~nuu
NUU / ABC_EARTH_2002
"What we all need at this point in human evolution
is to learn
what it takes to learn
what we should learn
- and learn it."
-- Aurelio Peccei, No Limits to Learning