Adam Wolpert - Dialogue Questions

[The following is the transcription of the second part of Adam Wolpert's Dialogue. It remains unedited at present, but will be updated shortly]

Momoko Tojo:

I agree with most of your talk, but I didn't really agree with something you said. You said something about cleaning up toxic waste with mushrooms. I think that you can't really take something that doesn't really belong there because it's not really part of that environment, and I think that this is really just like a band-aid solution and it's not the way you should deal with it - it's ok to pollute and clean it up - just because mushrooms are natural doesn't mean that they can't be harmless - just like (omission) contaminated the ecology, not pollutants.

Adam Wolpert:

Thank you and that's an excellent point. The point she brings up is a point is about exotics - exoctic species. And there's a problem in the world where exotic species, greedy apple trees, who want their seeds everywhere, and they kill everything that used to live there. It's colonisation - and plants do it all the time. Their very mean, and very tough, and Momoko is right - if you have a sustained system, if you have an ancient forest, if you have a healthy lake, if you have a beautiful river the last thing you want to do is bring something in there which is not part of the natural system, which is not part of that watershed, and have it make everything go to hell. That happens in California with a plant called Scotch Broom[?] which has come over from Europe, and although somewhere Scotch Broom is supposed to be there, and it's very nice, and it's pretty, it makes nice flowers; in California it's killing all of the native plants, it's running rampant - it's a very greedy plant, very bad. Where it's supposed to be it's part of a healthy system. The problem is, how many healthy systems are there left? Try to find some - they're very hard to find, and where Paul Stamets is putting mushrooms - he's putting mushrooms where abandoned oil refinery plants are. Soil which is completely dead, and contaminated, and there you put mushrooms. And there you find the keystone organism which will begin a process which is indigenous to that place, and that's why you have to understand, in biological processes, there's a link, there's a chain. And you can't go into a place, and put in an advanced organism, high on the chain, there - it'll take over. What you need to do is find a keystone organism that'll begin, like mushrooms, in that place - it brings the birds, and the birds bring the right seeds, because they live there, and they know. The birds know - they bring the right stuff. So it's a problem where things have gotten so mixed up. It's like human culture - there's been so much travelling of organisms that there's really no place left anymore where there aren't new organisms. And I've heard horrible stories about what happens when you get on an airplane, and you breath the air for twelve hours with two-hundred other people from all over the world. You know, talk about invasion of organisms. So, it's a very good point, but it's important that we understand that these organisms can help if they're inserted at the right place and the right time.

Kurt Von Unger:

First I would just like to mention that I'm glad that the temples that I know of in Japan are not burned down on a regular basis, because there is a lot of them that I do like. However I think that's not necessarily true. I would like to ask a question about building materials for houses. This is crazy, but I also think that it may be better to use wood, in a structure that you live in, with the idea that you'll stay in it for a long time, rather than using artificial materials. So what would you suggest as an ideal framework for materials. For example - to create living spaces.

Adam Wolpert:

Great question, and a wonderful topic. At the centre where I live, and which I think I was supposed to talk about more, we have an actual building workshop program. And we are looking at what we call natural building. And this is all part of the science of permaculture, a word that very simply means "humans creations that are established on the fundamental principles that nature uses in her creations." And one of those principles is the local conditions decide the behavior of the organism. And if you study any systems anywhere, the local conditions decide what the animals, plants, bugs, birds and fungi do in that system. And so, building is the same thing. The first thing to do with building is look where do you live. And the people who live in the desert - they learn to build earth houses, out of the earth and the desert. And in the desert it doesn't rain very much, so when you build an earth house in the desert, it lasts for a thousand years. Where I live it's a rainforest, and if you build an earth house in the rainforest, which we did, because we're teaching people how to build earth houses so we built one. We had to go and buy a very expensive metal roof, to put over the earth house, to keep the rain off it, because if you don't do that where I live, the earth house will be mud in two years. So there, the natural building technique is connected to the forest. And in England, there's a kind of building called "Waddle and Dobb"[?] where they take small saplings and make a screen, and then they pack mud inside. And if you build with wood that way, as you build, you maintain your forest. Because a good steward of a forest, since it's not an ancient forest, probably, because they've all been cut down, will thin the forest, and take out the saplings, and that's what you build with - and that's perfectly appropriate if you live in a forest, and it's perfectly insane if you live in the desert. So with natural building the first thing to know is where you are going. And the second thing to do, and this is permaculture, is look around and see what is abundant - sand, if wood is really abundant, it may be very right to build that way. And when you find what is abundant, really use it - go for it! Build a house, build ten houses - it's fine.

Ayelet Meir:

My comment is also to your talk and Satish Kumar and Galtung and fellow delegates, who are already sick of me at this point, but I really must say that I think the Gaia I experience, that you were talking about, and we're all connected and all one, surely this is the beginning point to all this, and how can we feel that we're part of everything when we alienate parts of ourselves even. Within ourselves there is no harmony, and Buddhism says that the outside world is a reflection of the inside world, and so the world is in the state that it is today, because we are in the state that we are in today. And so I would believe that all of these mental concepts of how to do, and how to work, and how to do this, surely must come from the very basic point that we don't even feel that we belong to ourselves, or to anything around us. So I think that is the basis of everything, and nobody is talking about that. Please talk about it!

Adam Wolpert:

Right on! One of our projects is what we call a horticultural therapy project, for people with aids in a town right near mine. And it's a warehouse which is a foodbank, where people bring food and the food is distributed to people suffering from AIDS, and what we've done is gone in and made a garden in there. And the garden grows food for people who come to the foodbank, but more importantly, the garden provides a place for them to put their hands in the soil. And it's amazing, just what you're saying, when you put your hands in the soil, it's like putting your hands inside yourself, and there's a whole field now, and Satish has written about this, called Horticultural Therapy, where it turns out, if it's true what Scientists say, that the earth is part of us, and we are part of the earth, and it's one whole. Put your hands in the soil and you're putting your hands in yourself. And in response to this question I'm going to indulge in a poem by Wendell Barry, who's a farmer and a poet which makes a better answer. He writes this poem after coming back from the fields.

Sowing the seed, my hand is one with the earth,
wanting the seed to grow, my mind is one with the light,
howing the crop, my hands are one with the rain,
having cared for the plants, my mind is one with the air,
hungry and trusting, my mind is one with the earth,
eating the fruit, my body is one with the earth.

[applause]

Andre Ponsia:

This is just a question - it's sort of related to what we're talking about - cutting down trees, and I see traditional crafts and traditional things like farming, and ceramics and sewing - all of these traditional things are essential to our holistic health and well-being. I was wondering, where do you see ceramics, wood fired ceramics. Being in this context as well - in Japan where it's a very integral part of the traditional culture. You use so much wood in wood fired ceramics, and also just as a comment about homes in this region, especially in the Kansai region, that ceramic walls - ceramics structures are very effective and a good way to build a home in this region.

Adam Wolpert:

Thank you. One thing also about Japan is a great example for us in their relationship with bamboo, which is a sustainable crop and is beautifully used in just about everything. The ceramics question is an excellent and important issue, and a friend of mine named Mark Lancett in California has just brought Sensei Musukabe to build a traditional wood-fired ceramic kiln, and their making tea bowls, and they're firing them for four days and nights - burning wood. I think it's extremely important to preserve and cherish culture, and it's extremely important to honour diversity, and the issue is one of scale. We have a big garden and there are certain plants in that garden which are wonderful in that garden, but if they get going they'll start really making problems. Similarly, if there are important elements of culture, like the wood firing process, if that's happening at an appropriate scale, it's probably not really a big part of the problem. The problem, of course, are the giant factories, that are burning and eating and gobbling. The problem are the newspapers - one day is a whole forest, and they are full of advertisements for things that we don't even want, that we've never even heard of. We've never even heard of these things, and these companies are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to convince you that you want a society and a kind of life that isn't even good for you. And they're cutting down all of the forests, and they're printing on the forests (instead of listening to the forests, they're printing on the forests) "buy the latest blah de blah," and as soon as you've bought it you'll get another advertisement, telling you that it's no good anymore "clearance sale - we have a new one, and that's better" and someone will stand up at the back and say "what about the kiln that's burning for four days?" That's something too. It's one page of one newspaper that's released one day in London or Los Angeles or Chicago, or Kyoto. One page will burn fires in ceramic kilns for the next ten years. I bet! You do the math. So when you look at a beautiful small thing, the reaction is always try to do - Johan talked about this. They take a beautiful small thing and they throw it all over your argument like a smoke bomb, and they say "Oh, well. You're talking about forests - I guess you must want to destroy culture and stop ceramics in Japan! You are shutting down Japanese culture." It's fine! It's really not a problem. And if you study global trends, wood-fired kilns are not a problem. So they're a drop in the ocean.

Anna Zyzniewska:

Hi! I really enjoyed your energy (omission) but I have a quick question and a quick comment. For example, if extra-terrestrials came to our planet right now and looked at how we live, they'd think we live to produce waste! That's my first comment. And then everything we do is just throw away - we buy and Iím really horrified by the situation right now in Japan, especially with everything being burned. Recycling is almost non-existent here. Now looking at global issues, I want to look at the global because there are six billion people right now. I mean climate-change - CO2 - scientists are saying that if CO2 goes up by so many PM then we're going to have a catastrophe in the near future. I feel (omission) the people who taught me that "yes you can buy that, or you can do that" and make little things to improve daily life, and make improvement to the whole planet. But is it really enough, I mean you look at people everyday are worried and doing things, and they forget about the big picture. Well I heard a comment one day - all the stuff we're doing is like moving the deck chairs on The Titanic ship that is sinking. What can you say about, for example, our lack of information, about the lack of quality of information, usually people don't know when they make choices, or too much information - that's my concern.

Adam Wolpert:

Yeah. Well here we are, and we're getting information that is very different from most information we get these days. So maybe conferences like this one, where people come together motivated by something other than money and personal advancement, maybe the information you get is a different quality. And maybe information, whenever you read about information, it's one word: "information." One word. Really it should be ten words - because the information about the sale of a product, that you don't want, and the information about the destruction of the rainforest - it's really not both information, because whatever you get is motivated by something, and I think the more that you are obtaining information that's motivated by a pure system of values; by a positive vibration, the more you get that kind of information, the more you can refine your way of being on the plant. Satish basically answered your question - it's one step, and if the Titanic is sinking, I'd want to do something. What are we going to do? Let's say The Titanic is sinking. OK. If no one can get up in an auditorium at the millennium and say "The Titanic is not going to sink! Don't be alarmed! Don't worry! It'll be all right!" OK maybe that's not true. So let's say, "the Titanic is sinking, and here's the schedule of the parties that we're are organising. We're going to start making love, eating good food, dancing together, staying up late with our friends, looking at the stars at night, sitting under the trees instead of cutting them down, watching the animals play instead of shooting them with guns, and the Titanic is sinking! I mean - come on! Both ways it's the same argument. Even if we become fully human and start really celebrating life, and we keep the ship from sinking, or the ship is sinking, let's at least become fully human and start celebrating life. It's the same outcome in both cases, and that's Gandhi. The process is it! It is the product. It's not about saving the world, or keeping this Titanic from sinking, because every single one of us is a Titanic that is sinking. We know this. The question is what is the quality of the information? what's the quality of your engagement? What do you get to do in the morning? And if you look at people who are supposedly successful running down the street with their laptop, their cellphone, their beeper, and their palmpilot - they're just running. And they're top of the heap, right? Those are the most oppressed people in the world. I read somewhere once that the curse of those without money, is that they never get to learn that it doesn't make you happy, because if you talk to people who have a lot of money, and most of them are not very happy. Most of them are hungry - hungry for something. What are they hungry for - they have everything? (omission)

Sally McLaren: Thank you very much , Adam! [applause]

Return to Adam Wolpert's Dialogue

Japanese Page
News
Panelists
Delegates
Archives Page 1
Press Cuttings
The Organisers
Objectives
Feedback
Front Page