NHK "caves in" on sex slaves

Chris Betros

Wednesday, March 21, 2001 at 18:00 JST

TOKYO -- NHK, the Japan Broadcasting Corporation, is under fire for revising the content of a sex slaves documentary it aired late January.

  Yayori Matsui, the leader of Violence Against Women in War-Network Japan (VAWW-NET Japan) that organised a mock Tokyo tribunal last December on the wartime responsibility of Emperor Hirohito and the Japanese military in the sex slave issue, blasted NHK for drastically changing the contents of the program a few days before the broadcast date. Matsui says there was no discussion about the changes.


  NHK said it did not touch on the tribunal's ruling in the interest of reconciliation between Japan and its Asian neighbours.


  "They caved into pressure from ultranationalists and some members of the Liberal Democratic Party," Matsui charged. "Now these rightists are boasting a victory over NHK in the battle to stop what they call a 'masochistic view of history.'"

  The issue of sex slaves has long been a hot potato for the Japanese media which usually refer to them as "comfort women."

  NHK and other production company staff covered the Dec 8-12 Women's International War Crimes Tribunal and interviewed Matsui and several professors supporting the tribunal.

  The mock tribunal found Hirohito "guilty" of the institutionalised sexual slavery system before and during World War II and urged Japan to compensate victims. However, the tribunal had no legal authority.

  Matsui said that VAWW NET cooperated with NHK during the preparation and proceedings of the tribunal because the broadcaster was making a four part series titled "How Is War To Be Judged?"

  The program in question was the second part in the series and was aired on Jan 31. But on Jan 27 more than 30 ultranationalists barged into NHK's offices in Tokyo's Shibuya district to demand cancellation of the program.

  Matsui claimed that NHK officials panicked and agreed to make changes. The station also inserted an interview with a professor critical of the tribunal after the 27th.

  "After that, they cut comments by the trial's supporters, making it four minutes shorter than the three other installments in the series, without consulting us," she said.

  Even worse, "there was no explanation of the core issue of the tribunal, namely, who the defendants were and what verdict was handed down." Nor were organisers given a chance to respond to the argument put forward by the critical professor, she said.

  Yasushi Higashizawa, lawyer for the VAWW-NET, described the changes made to the program as a "threat to the freedom of the press."

  Matsui said she had repeatedly asked NHK to explain the revisions. The broadcaster issued a statement on Feb 13 maintaining that no change in content was made in response to pressure from any specific organisation.

  "We produced the program in accordance with the project plan and editorial policy and aired it as originally planned," the NHK statement said, adding it did not touch on the tribunal's ruling in the interest of reconciliation between Japan and its Asian neighbours.

  Matsui insisted the NHK program was supposed to show how Japan's military sexual slavery constituted a crime against humanity. However, a spokesman for NHK said the aim of the four part series was to introduce worldwide activities concerning crimes against humanity, apparently diverting the focus from the liability of the Japanese military.

ioTj@Japan Today