[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[interdoc-y2k 328] Sink or swim? or Can a Bagelhole be a Life Preserver?
- To: year2000@efn.org, c2000@4hlists.org, A-book-for-Y2K@onelist.com, lsry2k@onelist.com, cpsr-y2k@cpsr.org, y2k@oceana.uml.edu, Tami@iguanamatic.com, forum@kqed.org, Dcabral@aol.com, fnb-l@tao.ca, tenner@excite.com, donella.h.meadows@dartmouth.edu, leftist@egroups.com, visionupdate@egroups.com, y2kpreps@listbot.com, essa@csf.colorado.edu, interdoc-y2k@jca.ax.apc.org, Build_it_Yourself@onelist.com, solarcooking-l@igc.org, wagingpeace@napf.org, transform@igc.org, insights@beprepared.com, y2kready@psimed.com, peace@csf.colorado.edu, homestead@listserv.oit.unc.edu, goforth@igc.org, selfsufficiency@egroups.com, rnn@rnn.com, island-wire@igc.org, cellspace-discuss@makelist.com, psn@csf.colorado.edu, envtecsoc@csf.colorado.edu, TAS@csf.colorado.edu, ci@context.org, register@telegraph.co.uk, y2kinfo@y2k.millennium-cafe.com, y2ksantafe@egroups.com, ecobalance@lists.gaia.org
- Subject: [interdoc-y2k 328] Sink or swim? or Can a Bagelhole be a Life Preserver?
- From: Bagelhole1@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 23:47:30 EDT
I have come to think that an understanding of human
and social psychology is the #1 requirement of formulating really effective
responses - not
better understanding of ecology etc (other people here may think: "of course
- what
else?!"; what I mean is - the more I observe, the more I see that human
psychoses are
all-pervasive and at the root of most problems).
- thomas beale
>>
Yes, but what causes humans to be psychotic, insane, irrational,
cold-hearted, and dysfunctional? The competitive structure of the society we
live in is the obvious answer. Indigenous people (undisturbed by modern
culture) tend to show a greater degree if community ability. Communion,
trust, and compassion the missing ingredients of our world are what is
usually big in theirs. Societies based on genuine community tend to be much
more mentally healthy and less dysfunctional than ours.
So how do we change the competitive/killer paradigm of our "deathkulture".
Only one way, that I can see; by creating models of what we want, i.e.
self-sustainable, autonomous, non-sovereign, mutually co-operative small
communities/neighborhoods.
This is not a luddite vision. Y2k teaches us that hi-tech is not bad, its
just extremely vulnerable. I love hi-tech and low-tech. For hi-tech to be
responsible, it needs low-tech as the foundation for our infrastructure. If
we had a strong low-tech infrastructure (i.e. individual or neighborhood food
production (aquaponics), non-reliance on fossil fuels, water catchment and
purification, composting toilets, solar passive heating and water heating,
etc.) the inhabitants of the planet would not be so vulnerable.
The analogy is the hi-tech Titanic and the low-tech rowboats needed to
protect the riders of the ship (oops, not enough lifeboats). After an entire
century, as much as we have advanced technologically, it is obvious, we still
haven't learned this cautionary lesson.
At my home in Bayview/ Hunters Pt in San Francisco, we are trying to make
ourselves a model of low-tech sustainability, such that others are welcome to
copy.
Currently, the aquaponics system (fishfarm integrated synergistically with
greenhouse) that we have built largely from found scrap is almost completed.
Utilizing 2 liter plastic pop bottles in a vertical structure we will have
720 vegetable sites in a 22'x7'x7' greenhouse, and over 500 fish living in an
eco-environment, that runs almost automatically with a solar pump. Soon we
will have photos up under the "Projects" section.
We are interested also in growing the "food for the new millenium" insects
and worms. Popular elsewhere. The time is ripe for confronting our prissy
conditioning, where eating meat is not considered gross, but insects are.
Just remember, meateaters are just one step away from cannibalism. I am a
vegetarian, but I am giving it up to eat fish and insects.
Then if y2k should cause infrastructure ruptures, there would be no need for
major concern, as there is now among those who realize that the possibility
of major infrastructure ruptures is not too remote to ignore, as is also true
from other disasters (weather, disease, eco-breakdown, natural disasters,
nuclear disasters, toxic disasters,etc.)
This is why I have an almost messianic zeal to see the world become as
self-sustainable as quickly as possible. I have a website (non-commercial)
focusing on low-tech sustainable ideas/methods explicitly for this purpose.
http://bagelhole.org .Please check it out, it is being fixed up every day and
is on its way to becoming truly effective.
Kind Regards,
Tom O (bagelhole1)
San Francisco