[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Y2K problem
On Wed, 13 Jan 1999 02:14:19, -0500 MS SHELLEY V CORBIN
<CMBH71C@prodigy.com> wrote:
> i have thought along these same lines, the feds pay farmers not to
> grow food, pressure should be put on them to pay all farmers
> availiable to grow extra food, classes should be available for folks
> to learn how to process their own food. there is no reason why this
> cant happen.
>
> Local govts. should be asked to bring grains from the
silos across
> America where they often rot every year and store them in accessible
> places for neighborhoods in your city.
>
this is all very well, but isn't it slightly ignoring
current economics and politics? and the simple fact that
wherever in the world it happens, food scarcity is almost
always because some people can't afford to pay for what
they need, (Ethiopia in the mid 1980s was a net grain
exporter) and even when free food is distributed, some
people are deemed not to deserve it?
I always remeber a bumper sticker I read in the USA:
'the best way to get back on your feet is to get off your
arse.'
not at all wishing to tar all americans with the same
brush, (nor to say that some are not quite lazy..) surely
the cultural dominance of extreme ignorant rightwing
assumptions like this needs to be challenged before or at
least when proposing nice neighborhood distribution
arrangements?
maybe San Fransisco is full of right-on community minded
people - but I can just imagine the mess in for example
Washington DC if the city's workers and inhabitants were
expected to share any more of the means of survival on an
equitable basis...
yours cynically but still hopeful,
zoe
Dept. of Geography
University of Hull
Hull, E. Yorks, UK
tel: 00 44 1482 465334
fax: 00 44 1482 466340
zoe.young@geo.hull.ac.uk